Sector
Every scope change gets claimed instead of quietly absorbed as a loss.
What it costs you today
The instruction came verbally on site, the work was carried out, and the claim was never raised. The cost stays with you.
You learn a package overran when the month closes, long after anything could have been done about it.
Percentage complete is estimated by the person who wants it to look a certain way, and the payment claim reflects that argument rather than the site.
How it works here
Signal
Site correspondence, instructions, messages, photography, valuations and cost records are read as the project runs.
Understanding
Instructions are matched against the contract to recognise what is genuinely a scope change, and photography is compared against the programme.
Action
A draft claim appears in front of the commercial manager with its instruction, dates and evidence already attached.
What it does from the first month
Captures
Instructions given in messages, meetings and site correspondence are recognised as scope changes, matched to the contract, and drafted into a claim with its evidence attached. Nothing depends on someone remembering to raise it.
Compares
Committed and actual cost is tracked against the bill of quantities continuously. A package trending over is visible while there is still something to be done about it.
Estimates
Site photography is compared against the programme to estimate what is genuinely complete. Payment claims are supported by evidence rather than by argument.
Assembles
Attendance, output, rework and responsiveness are recorded as the job runs. When it is time to award the next package, the conversation is grounded.
Chases
Requests for information, submittals and approvals are tracked to closure, with the delay attributed to whoever is actually holding it. The record you need in a dispute builds itself.
Watches
Cameras check safety compliance and site access. Equipment tracking shows what is genuinely in use and what is being paid for while standing still.
In practice
Three instructions were carried out and never raised as variations.
site correspondence + the contract + your cost records
Tower project · instructions matched to contract
Illustration of the interface. Your data, your wording, your records.
A Tuesday in your business
A client's engineer asks for a change on a site walk. It is agreed verbally, done that week, and would ordinarily have been absorbed. Instead the request — captured in the message that followed the walk — is recognised as a variation, priced against the contract, and put in front of the commercial manager as a draft claim with the instruction, the photographs and the dates already attached.
Why this pays
$88bn
of avoidable rework was caused by bad data in a single year — around 14% of all rework carried out globally.
Now put your own numbers in
We have not filled these in for you, and we are not going to. These are your figures, and the result is your estimate — not a claim of ours.
Recovered per year, on your numbers
—
Enter your figures on the left.
Currency is whatever yours is. We do not see these numbers — the calculation happens in your browser and is never sent anywhere.
Test this against your real dataWhat it connects to
Read as it is. Nothing here needs replacing, and nobody needs to change how they work.
What it watches
Where sensing earns its place. Supplied at cost plus installation, and never a condition of getting started.
Other sectors